tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1094740266140441205.post7275461364386800247..comments2023-05-23T08:46:26.870-07:00Comments on Holy Heroes!!: Action Comics #849Elliothttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08144417439505262113noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1094740266140441205.post-21217662918694660942007-08-21T15:54:00.000-07:002007-08-21T15:54:00.000-07:00But... doesn't that mean it's wrong for artists to...But... doesn't that mean it's wrong for artists to push their pictureviews on others? For scientists to spread theories? For reporters to report information or journalists to write columns?<BR/><BR/>Doesn't that mean that anyone talking to or interacting with anyone else is basically a violation of the other person's free will?Bansheehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12594214770417497135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1094740266140441205.post-41718691078034822062007-06-07T11:39:00.000-07:002007-06-07T11:39:00.000-07:00I bought this one due to the last post and convers...I bought this one due to the last post and conversation. I agree that it came out about as bad as I thought. The only saving grace was that the problem was tied up in the preacher and wasn't a direct indictment of God. <BR/><BR/>Unfortunately, most of the rest was relativistic, post-modern thinking on religion: the important thing is to have faith, not to push it on others. The missionaries being criticized for strings attatched to their good works. Nice way for the writers to push their views through such a spokesman as Superman.<BR/><BR/>Interestingly, <A HREF="http://www.supermanhomepage.com/comics/2007-post-crisis-reviews/c-review-2007.php?topic=action849" REL="nofollow">this reviewer</A> agreed with the premise of the writers, but didn't like what they did with the 2-parter.Jasonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18363518142334125056noreply@blogger.com